This table provides metadata for the actual indicator available from Lao PDR statistics closest to the corresponding global SDG indicator. Please note that even when the global SDG indicator is fully available from Lao statistics, this table should be consulted for information on national methodology and other Lao-specific metadata information.
Goal |
SDG 3: Good Health and Well-being: Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages |
---|---|
Target |
3.1 By 2030, reduce the global maternal mortality ratio to less than 70 per 100,000 live births. |
Indicator |
3.1.2 Proportion of birth attended by skilled health personnel |
Series |
Proportion of births attended by skilled health personnel |
Metadata update |
23 June 2021 |
Organisation |
Lao Statistics Bureau |
Contact person(s) |
Mr.Vilaysook SISOULATH |
Contact organisation unit |
Department of Social Statistics |
Contact person function |
Deputy Director General |
Contact phone |
+856 20 55 795 043 +856 21 214 740 |
Contact email |
vilaysooks@gmail.com lstats@lsb.gov.la |
Definition and concepts |
Definition: Percentage of births attended by skilled health personnel (generally doctors, nurses or midwives) is the percentage of childbirths attended by professional health personnel. According to the revised definition (https://data.unicef.org/resources/definition-of-skilled-health-personnel-providing-care-during-childbirth/) these are competent maternal and newborn health (MNH) professionals educated, trained and regulated to national and international standards. They are competent to: (i) provide and promote evidence-based, human-rights based, quality, socio-culturally sensitive and dignified care to women and newborns; (ii) facilitate physiological processes during labour and delivery to ensure a clean and positive childbirth experience; and (iii) identify and manage or refer women and/or newborns with complications. Traditional birth attendants, even if they receive a short training course, are not included. |
Unit of measure |
percent, % |
Classifications |
N/ |
Data sources |
The Lao Social Indicator Survey |
Data collection method |
The Lao Social Indicator Survey II (LSIS II) was carried out in 2017 by Lao Statistics Bureau (LSB) in collaboration with the Ministry of Health and Ministry of Education and Sport, as part of the Global Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey (MICS) Programme. Data are collected through household survey-anthropometric measurement. Sampling approach: Two-stage, stratified cluster sampling. Questionnaires: Type of interview: Face-to-face. MICS survey utilized Computer-Assisted Personal Interviewing (CAPI) starting in 2017 round. Fieldwork duration: 06 July to 06 November 2017 Data processing. The data collection application was based on the CSPro (Census and Survey Processing System) software, Version 6.3, including a MICS dedicated data management platform. Procedures and standard programs2 developed under the global MICS programme and adapted to the LSIS II, 2017 questionnaire were used throughout. The CAPI application was tested in Vientiane Capital and Vientiane Province in January. Based on the results of the CAPI-test, modifications were made to the questionnaires and application. Training: Training for the fieldwork was conducted for 31 days between June and July 2017. Training included lectures on interviewing techniques and the contents of the questionnaires, and mock interviews between trainees to gain practice in asking questions. Participants first completed full training on paper questionnaires, followed by training on the CAPI application. The trainees spent three days in field practice and one day on a full pilot survey in Vientiane province. The training agenda was based on the standard MICS6 training agenda. Enumerators (data collectors) received dedicated training on anthropometric measurements and water quality testing for a total of seven days, including three days in field practice and pilot survey. Field Supervisors attended additional training on the duties of team supervision and responsibilities. Fieldwork: The data were collected by 25 teams; each was comprised of four interviewers, one driver, two measurers and a supervisor. Fieldwork began in July 2017 and concluded in November 2017. Data was collected using tablet computers running the Windows 10 operating system, utilising a Bluetooth data transfer application for field operations, enabling transfer of assignments and completed questionnaires between supervisor’s and interviewer’s tablets. For detailed methodology, please see the survey report. (Link provided in the reference section). |
Data collection calendar |
Every five years, next collection period will be from July to November 2022 |
Data release calendar |
one year after the reference year, next release will be in November 2023 |
Data providers |
Lao Statistics Bureau |
Data compilers |
Lao Statistics Bureau |
Institutional mandate |
Data collection, processing, dissemination and use of statistics for this indicator is in accordance with the Statistics Law 2017; the National Strategy for Sustainable Development of Statistical System (NSSDSS) 2016-2020; and the Vision for 2030. |
Rationale |
Having a skilled attendant at the time of childbirth is an important lifesaving intervention for both women and babies. Not having access to this key assistance is detrimental to women's health because it could cause the death of the women or long-lasting morbidity, especially in vulnerable settings. |
Method of computation |
The number of women aged 15-49 with a live birth attended by a skilled health personnel (e.g. doctors, nurses or midwives) during delivery is expressed as a percentage of women aged 15-49 with a live birth in the same period. |
Validation |
Standard data review and validation protocols were implemented from data collection, processing, calculation to finalization and publication of the results of the survey. Likewise, consultation process with line ministries and partner agencies on the national data submitted for the SDGs Indicators were conducted prior to the publication of results |
Quality management |
Managing the quality of the indicator is guided by the Lao PDR Statistics Law of 2017 and in accordance with the recommendations of the UN Fundamental Principles of Official Statistics. |
Quality assurance |
Team supervisors were responsible for the daily monitoring of fieldwork. Mandatory re-interviewing was implemented on one household per cluster. Daily observations of interviewer skills and performance was conducted. During the fieldwork period, each team was visited multiple times by survey management team members and field visits were arranged. Throughout the fieldwork, field check tables (FCTs) were produced weekly for analysis and action with field teams. The FCTs were customized versions of the standard tables produced by the MICS Programme. These steps are taken to ensure quality of outputs produced is at par with international standards. |
Quality assessment |
In general, the quality of the survey results is considered high given the quality management and standards implemented along with the high response rates for all age groups covered in the basic data source used for obtaining the value for this SDG indicator. |
Data availability and disaggregation |
LSIS has been conducted at five-year intervals since 2011-2012. Hence, data are available for 2012 and 2017. Breakdown/disaggregation: by Location (Urban/Rural), Sex |
References and Documentation |
The Lao Social Indicator Survey II, 2017 The UNSD SDG Indicators, Metadata repository https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/metadata/ Lao PDR Statistics Law, 2017 |